Tuesday, May 19, 2020

The New Style Of Lecturing Now - 1243 Words

Academic cheating, achieved threw supposition of certain grades, job opportunities and extreme goals have lead to a high percentage of 75% test takers, including graduate students and high schools students that have agreed amongst this crime which surprisingly has being evolving as technology and higher requirements in society grows. The result of heavy workloads, Intense GPAs and risky temptations has resulted in an increase, 20% during the 1940s vs. 80% during the 2000s, which has shocked both many others and me. Such inclined numbers have led to increases in academic dishonesty that led to the enforcement of stricter, unavoidable routes. The new style of lecturing now leaves the vigorous work for home which can drastically increases†¦show more content†¦The high percentages of workload vs. those lectures in college are proved to endorse greater amounts of stress and work to be completed at home leading to the result of academic dishonesty. High expectations of grades and attendance also influence the rise in academic dishonesty. The college teaching style changed just as the grading systems. The excessive use and enforcement of the GPA calculator has been engraved in our minds since the late years of middle school. Hearing the phrases, â€Å"A high GPA will get you into a better college.† â€Å"Graduate with a high GPA!† All has affected our reflection our numerical number representing our ‘intelligence.’ Cheating is seen as an escape to difficult assignments that challenges the range of there GPA. Cheating can be used to increase ones chances of higher grades and percentages in a class that’s considered hard or a difficult learning environment that is rough to push threw with a promise-able grade which also led back to the fact that all these heavy weighted assignments due tend to affect ones workload. Cheating is heavily used as ones gateway to success but I believe the punishments are not thoroughly enforced to make one temptation resistible. That lack of engagement by the academic staff and policies do raise the interest and temptation of such an act leading to an ease and questionable escape to

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Walter Lippmanns Views on Presidential Ability to Make...

Walter Lippmanns Views on Presidential Ability to Make U.S. Foreign Policy In his book entitled Public Opinion Walter Lippmann presents some very profound arguments on how public opinion is formed and how mach value it has. He describes in great detail the decision making process and how our own stereotypes affect our perception of events. Lippmann expresses his disillusionment with mass democracy, his concerns about propaganda and how the press could not be trusted to provide unbiased information. Contrary to what one would expect form someone holding such views Lippmann also questions the trustworthiness of the chief executive to make good foreign policy, even when he has all of the inside information and knows the true nature†¦show more content†¦However there are plenty of examples which show that Lippmann has hit on a key point here. One such example is the bombing of Nagasaki (second atomic bomb) and President Harry Truman. It has long been debated whether the second atomic bomb was really necessary to bring World War II to an end. Th ere has been much evidence that the Japanese had indicated a desire to surrender prior to the bombing but with the only condition that they be allowed to keep their emperor. An important clue was the diary of President Truman. The following is an excerpt from his diary concerning the use of the atomic bomb: Even if the Japs are savages, ruthless, merciless and fanatic, we as the leader of the world for the common welfare cannot drop that terrible bomb on the old capital or the new. When the official order for using the bombs was given there was no mention of sparing cities or civilian targets. The cities were the targets themselves. The point is that Trumans own personal stereotypes of the Japanese are evident in this entry. The entry can be interpreted as Truman viewing the Japanese as being less than human. When one views another group as being less than human it becomes much less difficult to give an order which will end the lives of hundreds of thousands of people. So it is quite possible that his own personal stereotypes played a role along with the argument that the bombs would expedite the end of the war and

Dolce and gabbana Essay Example For Students

Dolce and gabbana Essay Dolce and Gabbana, an Italian ready-to-wear line, was founded in 1982 by Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana. Since the distinguished duo established they have become influential and innovative to the fashion industry. Their clothes signify a sanguine, sexy glamour, which, however raw, never over powers the wearers character, making them one of the most momentous design forces to emerge from Italy in recent years. Domenico Dolce was born in Palermo, Italy on August 13, 1958 to a Sicilian tailor. He worked in his fathers shop at the young age of six, I was obliged by my parents to work in the atelier, where I started drawing and sewing and I loved it. I was making miniature clothes as samples. He began studying science at a university but quickly grew bored of the monotony of the subject and dropped out to attend art school. After graduation from the art school Dolce left his native city and traveled to Milan seeking fame and fortune.Stefano Gabbana was born in Venice, Italy on November 14, 1962. Gabbana always had an admiration of clothing, but never fantasized becoming involved in the fashion industry, Since I was a child I really liked fashion. When I was thirteen I was going to Fiorucci to buy the most trendy things; but I didnt think the pleasure of dressing myself would become my job. Although he studied art at a college in Monza, he left before receiving a degree and became an advertising art director. While working for the same Milan based fashion designer Dolce and Gabbana met and found they shared many similar idols and influences. Although Gabbana was from Northern Italy, they both alike profess their prominent influence is the Mediterranean. Stefano claims his admiration evolved by watching classic movies with Southern Italian actresses such as Sophia Loren and Gina Lollobrigida, whose voluptuous bodies are constrained by tight suits, stockings and suspenders. Adoration and glorification of the female body is the departure point for all of Dolce and Gabbanas female collections. The two have been quoted as saying that breasts are the points of departure for all of their designs. Other inspirations include films of the fifties by directors like Roberto Rossellini and Luchino Visconti and photos of Enzo Sellerio as well as by Giuseppe Lampedusas. In 1981, one year after meeting, they formed a partnership and began to work as subcontractors to factories and thread companies. For the next five years they remained faithful to their fantasy of one-day working independently, refusing lucrative opportunities, which would have sacrificed their autonomous nature. Finally their determination and perseverance paid off in 1985 when Beppe Modenese invited them to show their designs at the New Talents Forum of the Milan Collections. The next spring Stefano and Domenico had their first design on the catwalk. With borrowed money and girl friends as models, they launched Real Women which were quickly being purchased from stores like Browns and Harvey Nichols. When their fall collection, Transformations, hit he runway the fashion world was beginning to sit up and take notice to Dolce and Gabbana. In 1987, with their first knitwear show behind them, they set up their own showroom in Via Santa Cecilia. From that point on, Dolce and Gabbana were in the big time, showing in Tokyo and broadened their horizons by adding lingerie; beachwear and mens wear collections. By 1990 they had become full-fledged international designer label with all associated accouterments. New shops opened in huge cities such as New York and Milan. In this same year the company did $66 million, doubling that of the previous year. The two have really come a long way from the days of sewing their own garments. Both claim they would not continue on their own, If I had to stop working with Domenico, I probably wouldnt be in the fashion industry anymore, claims Stefano.Domenico holds a similar attitude, I wish I could go back, to be in a room with a shelf full of fabrics, a mannequin, a sewing machine and two women- I would be very happyWe dont know what it would be like to be like to work alone. Dolce and Gabbana take equal responsibilities for both